Code review, PR labelling, linting, test selection and semantic code search on Jev. Every entry links to its source and shows the figures its author published.
38 builds
Niaz Morshed
@niazmorshed_
built `jev-review` @typesafeai
it's an experimental, local-first MCP plugin that gives coding agents a score quality feedback loop across different metrics.
agents call jev while they work, get scored, make improvements, and repeat the loop
try below 👇
I got access to Jev by @typesafeai today morning and I built a cool use case for it
Introducing DiffJury - simply paste any public PR link and Jev tells you immediately if it's safe to merge or does it require review ✅
🔗 Feel free to try it out here - http://diffjury.up.railway.app
Imagine Jev being able to tell you if you should merge a PR with grounded context of your codebase. that's what we're building at @graphify 👀
It's fascinating how insanely fast Jev is... the model architecture in itself is quite interesting and this has opened up a plethora of new use cases and I'm sure the internet will pick up on it sooner than anyone'd expect
e2e + jev from @typesafeai ⚡
I'm building an open-source framework for running e2e tests with agents. supports web, mobile (and more!)
available soon: tester.army/e2e
A prose linter for AI writing tells: regex rules plus Jev for judgment.
DWDaniel Willoughby
27
Saeed
@stringsaeed
built a highlighter on jev
paste any language → my code tokenizes → jev names the lang, colours every word, then says which of 9 lint rules fire and where
nine rules in code. jev just answers. near instant
lab.saeed.sh/highlight
JEV is changes the world of E2E testing!
Same eBay test flow, completed-run medians:
Jev: 47s / $0.0067
GPT-5.6 Luna: 62s / $0.0277
Claude Sonnet 5: 79s / $0.4062
Try jev-e2e.
github.com/perixtar/jev-e…
A warden that will not let a coding agent finish on a claim.
QQkal
MajdAICode
@MajdAICode
Following up on my earlier comment: I mapped out the coding-agent workflow I’m exploring in a short video—Cursor, a separate worktree for each feature, and Jev for narrow decisions 👇
x.com/MajdAICode/sta…
One coding-agent pattern I’m exploring: /ticket-triage asks Jev where to look; Cursor checks the repo; Jev flags possible test gaps after the diff. PHPUnit/Playwright verify behavior, and I review before commit.
Video: x.com/MajdAICode/sta…
JEV IS INSANE
your coding agents forget everything the second the session ends.
Every fix. Every dead end you already hit. Every "no, not like that."
Gone. Tomorrow you teach it all over again.
Someone just open sourced the fix, and it runs on Jev.
It's called Beacon, by @asymptotelabs.
It pulls in your session history from Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode and 20+ other agent tools and turns it into one shared memory.
But storing everything isn't the hard part.
Most agent runs are GARBAGE to learn from.
Failed commands.
Wrong turns.
One off hacks you'd never want repeated.
Save all of that and your agent just gets confidently worse.
So Beacon keeps the full history, and Jev decides what actually earns a spot in memory.
Promote it.
Send it for review.
Or throw it away.
That's a decision you need on thousands of sessions, which is exactly why it has to be cheap.
The runs that survive get turned into reusable skills.
So something Cursor figured out on Monday shows up in your Claude Code session on Tuesday.
Your agents stop starting from zero.
Every good run makes the next one smarter.
Repo: http://github.com/Asymptote-Labs/agent-beacon
Star it and save this.
follow @cyrilXBT
I made a tool with Jev that reads my whole codebase to answer one question: what should I be looking at?
Every chunk of code in your project is scored for relevance.