
Updated Oct 12, 2026
What people are building with Jev
838 projects, posts and guides about Jev, the System One model from TypeSafe AI. Each entry links to its source and shows the cost and speed its author reported.
- 838builds
- 176guides
- 21use cases

Diogo Almeida
@CompleteSkeptic
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free) • Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution


NO1ennn
@N01ennn
this is pure f*cking treasure A Stanford AI research group finally drew the perfect RAG system: retrieval, Jev and agents in one loop, and it fixes the 3 things that break every RAG app: > the LLM reads 20 passages when only 3 matter > it answers questions your docs can't answer > it trusts whatever text it retrieves here's how it runs: > a lead agent sends the query > hybrid search pulls the top 20 candidates, dense + keyword > ONE Jev request scores all 20 + 2 gates: answerable? injection? > only passages above 0.6 reach the writer agent > a second Jev call checks every claim against its source > grounded answer, with citations and when the docs don't have it: > answerable fails, the writer never runs > a researcher agent rewrites the query and retries once > still nothing? "not in the docs". zero tokens spent on a guess retrieval casts the net. Jev decides what's real. agents do the work save this before you build your next RAG

Gipp 🦅
@gippp69
Jev builders: the model bill is decided before the model is called /routing 20,000 events/day become: → 14,000 die as noise → 4,700 become logs → 800 earn a draft → 500 go to human review only 4% reaches writing. Jev costs $0.84; the full loop lands at $29.04. optimize the 4% before the writer.
XRouting and model choice
20,000 events a day, 4% reach the writer
- Events per day
- 20,000
- Reach the writer
- 4%
- Jev cost
- $0.84
- Full loop
- $29.04

laxman
@llmluthor
Releasing Your Own Jev Post-train a 4B/8B/27B judge on your agent's traces. It beats Jev. 79.7% agreement with human labels vs Jev's 66.3% Beats DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (763B) by 14 points 0.13s per step on a single GPU Completely open source: recipe, data, training, evals
XOpen source
Post-train your own judge on your agent's traces
- Agreement with humans
- 79.7%
- Jev agreement
- 66.3%
- Per step
- 0.13s

Avi Chawla
@_avichawla
Another insane Jev use case! Traditional database filters need precise, predefined conditions. But many questions are semantic: - Is this article mainly about software engineering? - Which topic best describes it? - How technically deep does it appear? These usually require moving rows into application code, invoking a model, parsing its output, and writing the result back. pg-jev is an open-source Postgres extension that exposes Jev through SQL functions. - jev() works inside WHERE - jev_prob() returns a probability - jev_choice() selects a label - jev_score() ranks rows across ordered levels. It needs no vector column or embedding index. Under the hood, pg-jev batches rows, sends them to Jev, and returns typed answers that SQL can filter, sort, group, and combine with exact predicates. The recording below runs it against real Hacker News stories stored in Postgres. It first shows the rows, then asks Jev to find software-engineering stories, classify them by topic, and rank them by technical depth. The final query reports requests, tokens, cost, and cache hits from the database session. GitHub repo: https://github.com/realZachi/pg-jev (don't forget to star it ⭐) Postgres keeps the data and controls the query, while Jev handles the part SQL cannot express as a deterministic condition. If you want to understand what Jev is doing under the hood, I also wrote a hands-on guide to building a Jev-style model with open models, entirely locally. Read it below.
XDocuments and OCR
Semantic database filters

David K 🎹
@DavidKPiano
I mixed Jev + an espresso (state) machine. Turns out, Jev's a pretty good barista ☕ Introducing Jevspresso: XState determines what's possible, Jev decides the next move. Order in plain language, or break stuff and watch Jev cope. Try it: jevspresso.dev

Nate Berkopec
@nateberkopec
I liked this idea, so I built my own version which uses Jev + Luna to make this basically free for any Pi session. github.com/nateberkopec/d…
GitHubContext and memory
A You Should Know plugin for Pi, on Jev and Luna

Sumanth
@Sumanth_077
I built a data analyst agent with Jev as the review layer! Qwen handles the main agent work, Jev acts as the review layer, and Vercel eve runs the agent loop, tool execution, and human approval flow. The agent takes a plain-English question about the data, inspects the database schema, writes the SQL, runs the query, and explains the result. The interesting part is what happens around that main loop. Qwen is responsible for generating the SQL and the final answer, while Jev reviews the parts where semantic judgment is actually useful. Anything that can be checked reliably with code stays deterministic. Jev reviews the agent at three points: - Before the agent starts, it checks whether the user's question is clear enough to answer from the available data. - After Qwen generates the SQL, it checks whether the query actually represents what the user asked. - After the query runs, it checks whether the final explanation is grounded in the returned rows. For example, we tested it with: “Who is our best customer?” The question sounds simple, but “best” could mean highest revenue, most purchases, highest average order value, or something else. Instead of letting Qwen silently choose a metric, Jev flagged the question as ambiguous and asked for clarification. The same separation applies to SQL execution. Qwen can propose a query, but it cannot decide whether that query is safe to run. The tool accepts only a single read-only `SELECT`, SQLite runs in read-only mode, results are capped at 200 rows, and queries without a `WHERE` clause can require human approval before execution. Those checks do not need another model call. But a query can be completely safe and still answer the wrong question. A deterministic rule can verify that the SQL is read-only. It cannot reliably judge whether a query for “revenue last month” accidentally calculates revenue across all time. That is where Jev comes in. It reviews the proposed SQL against the original question and schema before execution. After the rows come back and Qwen writes the explanation, Jev reviews that answer again to check whether the claims are actually supported by the returned data. The project uses a local SQLite sales database, Qwen through the Vercel AI Gateway, Gradio for the interface, and only two database tools: "inspect_schema" and "run_sql". No single model is responsible for everything. Qwen generates, Jev reviews, deterministic code controls execution, and Vercel eve manages the agent loop and approval flow. GitHub Repo: https://github.com/Sumanth077/Hands-On-AI-Engineering/tree/main/ai_agents/nl_data_analyst_agent 100% open source.
XAgents and browsers
A data analyst agent with Jev as the review layer

Kevin
@kevincodex
meet jev spider . it decides the size, color and position of any website components and rearrange them base on its preference powered by jev jev-spider.fly.dev
Live siteUI
jev spider

Madison Rickert
@MadisonJRickert
Anthropic released native mods for customizing Claude Code yesterday, so I did the obvious thing and built a Jev-based classifier for auto mode! 2x faster permission checks! github.com/madisonrickert… #ClaudeCode #Jev

Paone
@paonx_eth
i sent a crawler through github's new ai repos from the last 30 days. this is what it looks like 1 crawler turns into 128 2,000 repos, every readme, every word it steps on each one goes to jev with one question: is this worth your time? 99.3% got thrown out. wrappers, copies, empty readmes, lists of lists 9 survived: 01 colibri · runs a 744b model on 16gb of ram and a big ssd. slow, but it's yours 02 voicebox · clone a voice from a few seconds of audio. 23 languages, nothing leaves your machine 03 BrowserSkill · tencent. claude code or codex works in your logged-in browser while you keep working 04 security-audit-skill · the skill cloudflare's bug-hunting harness grew from 05 open-code-review · alibaba's internal ai code reviewer. ~1/9 the tokens of claude code on the same model 06 agent-skills · 25 senior-engineer workflows: /spec /plan /build /test /review /ship 07 OpenResearch · turns claude code or codex into a research agent: papers, hypotheses, experiments 08 WeKnora · tencent. drop in your docs, get rag answers, an agent and a wiki that maintains itself 09 ECC · 68 agents and 293 skills for claude code, codex and cursor. 272k stars 4 of the 9 come from alibaba, cloudflare and tencent. big tech is open-sourcing the ai tools it runs on itself links in the reply. save this
XDocuments and OCR
2,000 new AI repos, one question each
- Repositories read
- 2,000
- Thrown out
- 99.3%
- Crawlers
- 128

koha
@kohawithstuff
I made Jev AI control the NPC in this game 👉🏼 gta.koha.wtf
Live siteGames and real time
Jev controls the NPC

Burak Karakan
@burakkarakann
I built a query layer that automatically routes the queries to one of the configured query engines using Jev, all running on top of Iceberg. Fast decision models unlock interesting use cases indeed. Should we open-source this?
XRouting and model choice
A query router on top of Iceberg


Dr. Shawn
@aroogle
I’ve built an AI system using Jev and Groq that turns your speech into powerful visual slides, charts and animations as you talk with 70-300ms latency. Should I open source it or charge people to use it so that I can buy more hedera-hashgraph:native ? Kind of love the addictive feeling of open sourcing things… just feels so legendary

Mastra
@mastra
Last week, we launched: 1/ Classifiers with Jev 2/ Jira, GitLab and incident.io integrations for Mastra Factory 3/ Memory hooks 4/ VPC-isolated Postgres for Mastra platform + a lot of smaller improvements.
XSDKs and integrations
Classifiers with Jev in Mastra

Pedro Martins
@nikuscs
Having some fun doing my own Grok Bot @bot ( Dots, Muse ) alternative with @tan_stack start, @pidotdev + @Cloudflare durable objects! 💅 - Multi-harness Support - Multi Decision Room Routing ( Jev, LLM Judge, Roundtable ) - Memory for Bots, Rooms & Global - Reactions 👍 - Daemon runs locally + web on cloudflare - File Support with R2, Room data & Bot Data exportable on CF durable. Will open-source next week hopefully, so give a follow & stay tunned. I was going to use some open-source alternatives or fork them, but most of them are damn sloppy, my ideia is to use this for myself since OpenClaw & Hermes lack group collaboration & a proper mobile / responsive design. Dots is not available in EU, Grok is "locked" to grok models but for me its still the best in terms of UX/UI overall so congrats to Cursor & Xai Team :p
XRouting and model choice
A group chat bot with decision room routing

NatashaTheRobot
@NatashaTheRobot
I built a small AskHIG CLI tool + agent plugin to help the agent load only the RELEVANT HIG guides into context via an /askHIG command. It uses @typesafeai Jev to decide which guides, so all you need is a personal typesafe API key and you're all set! I would open source it, but don't want to get in trouble with 🍎... If you'd like access, reply with your github username in the comments and I'll add you to the repo!
XContext and memory
AskHIG

Ayush Gupta
@madmecodes
Found this pretty interesting repo: herdr + jev = agent router You give it a coding task, and it routes it to the right agent + model + reasoning effort based on the task and your available quota. Supports Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode. Basically a load balancer for your coding agents. https://github.com/nidhi-singh02/agent-router Thanks @nidhisinghattri
XRouting and model choice
herdr + jev, an agent router

Simon Shg
@ShengSSX
2 AI colleagues just booked us a demo off someone's random post online Ava and Owen are the two agents running our prospecting in @Parall_HQ. they live in our @Parall_HQ workspace like everyone else on the sales team, and @typesafeai Jev makes the quick judgement calls for them > Jev reads every post, Ava wakes up only for the ones that fit us > Jev rates every account, Ava only works the best ones > Owen writes the email, our human AE approves > Jev sorts the replies, Owen only chases the interested ones you don’t need to hand them leads. jevable makes it possible for proactive agents to own a job at 86% less cost than agents that check in every 30 min
GitHubAgents and browsers
Jevable
- Always-on cost
- 86% lower
- Caught of what mattered
- 85%
- Benchmark events
- 334

Aditya Rao
@dev_adityarao
Catching AI agents that secretly collude usually means reading their minds. I just read their chat instead, using Jev by TypeSafe AI It named the colluders 85% of the time. Built for the AI Swarm Dynamics Hackathon by @grove_research & @aidigest_. Thanks for letting people join online, I really enjoyed it!

dante (단테)
@wildseven77
Jev and Laya have been getting a lot of buzz lately. Can we use them in ComfyUI too? Yes. I built a node pack that branches a workflow on a plain-English question, like "Too graphic for kids?" Runs locally with Laya, or flip one dropdown to Jev. github.com/dante01yoon/Co…
GitHubSDKs and integrations
ComfyUI-SystemOne

moub.dev
@emoubarak_
Agent: "done" ✅ UI: looks fine ✅ Database: the free plan just published a 2nd project and took the 1st one offline ❌ I stopped trusting my AI agent's "done". Now the database is the judge. jev-check, an open-source skill for Claude Code and Codex 👇
XCoding and code review
jev-check

butonu kirmizi yapabilir miyiz
@serhatgpt
Built an open-source 𝕏 filter powered by uprising decision models! Instead of slow, pricey LLMs, it leverages @typesafeai Jev & @CloudflareDev Clef to detect politics, soccer & crypto noise in <100ms. Zero tracking & 100% local. Links below 👇

Bret Morris
@4bret
Built a tool to help fill out your LA County ballot for Nov 3: take a quiz, enter your address, get a match for every contest, from governor to water board. Claude did the research, Jev the scoring. Open source: check the logic or fork it. la-ballot-match.vercel.app
Live siteTools and apps
LA Ballot Match

OpenAI Developers
@OpenAIDevs
Let your app choose the right model, tool, or action in near real-time with Decisions API, now available to all developers in public beta. The Decisions API makes decisions up to 10x faster than GPT-6 Luna through the Responses API.


Unsloth AI
@UnslothAI
You can now train your own Decision model like Jev locally! We increased Qwen3.5 0.8B’s aggregate accuracy from 20.7% to 74.3% across 3 decision benchmarks - on just 4GB VRAM. Turn any LLM like Qwen3.8, Gemma 4 into decision models with our open-source Unsloth repo. We fine-tuned with a Clef head using Unsloth and LoRA (r=64) for one epoch, increasing downstream accuracy from 30–37% to 78%. GitHub: https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth Guide and Notebooks: https://unsloth.ai/docs/basics/train-your-own-decision-model-with-unsloth
XOpen source
Train your own decision model with Unsloth
- Accuracy before
- 20.7%
- Accuracy after
- 74.3%
- VRAM
- 4GB

Liquid AI
@liquidai
Announcing d1 with vision. 👁️👁️ Our first decision model now supports images, text or both as inputs. We tested d1 against GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 on six real applications, from filtering support tickets to inspecting circuit boards. d1 matches or beats GPT-6.1 Sol on four of them. It costs 19x to 200x less than both models and answers significantly faster on every task. > probabilities for yes/no, choice, or score questions > one forward pass, without generating tokens > text decisions in 200 to 300 ms > Liquid API: https://console.liquid.ai 🧵

Liquid AI
@liquidai
d1-3B ranks first among models under 10B on the Decision Index v0.2.1, a benchmark for structured decision-making. Built from LFM2.5-VL-3B, it makes decisions from text and images in one pass. Use it for reranking, agent guardrails, and visual inspection. 2/

ollama
@ollama
.@Cloudflare's decision models are available on Ollama! Decision models allow you to classify an image, label a bug report or route a support ticket to the right team. Clef (27B): ollama pull clef Clef Flash (9B): ollama pull clef-flash

Perplexity Developers
@perplexitydevs
pplx-decider-v1.1-27b, our updated open weights multimodal decision model, is now available. It scores the highest on the new @huggingface Decision Index 0.3 benchmark. pplx-decider-v1.1-27b costs half as much as v1, at $0.02 per million input tokens. huggingface.co/spaces/multimo…

OpenRouter
@OpenRouter
New: Decision Model Rankings! See the spend share and token share of different decision models and task types, including Relevance, Correctness, Instruction Following and more. @typesafeai is leading all categories today.
XBenchmarks and evals
OpenRouter Decision Model Rankings

vogel
@ryanvogel
OpenAI just released their Decisions API so I put it head to head with Jev & Clef and its FASTTT
XBenchmarks and evals
OpenAI Decisions against Jev and Clef

Aravind Srinivas
@AravSrinivas
Pokémon FireRed’s Elite Four + Champion, cleared in one shot - with decision-making powered by Perplexity’s Decisions API. The actual run stats: 592 ms median API response 987 ms p95 - 96.4% of responses under one second $0.028 estimated inference cost, 137 live API calls
XGames and real time
Pokémon FireRed's Elite Four on Perplexity's Decisions API
- Median response
- 592 ms
- p95
- 987 ms
- Estimated cost
- $0.028
- API calls
- 137

Fayaz Ahmed
@fayazara
My not hotdog app is so much faster than your not hotdog app Powered by Cloudflare Clef
XDocuments and OCR
Not hotdog, on Clef