
GitHubSocial feeds
Sniff Test
A prose linter for AI writing tells: regex rules plus Jev for judgment.
Daniel Willoughby
27Updated Sep 25, 2026
Projects, posts and guides about Jev, the System One model from TypeSafe AI. Each entry links to its source and shows the cost and speed its author reported.

Diogo Almeida
@CompleteSkeptic
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free) • Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution

GitHubSocial feeds
A prose linter for AI writing tells: regex rules plus Jev for judgment.
Daniel Willoughby
27Codez
@0xCodez
Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code or Codex era, they are still part of the assistance era with human in the loop - JEV is what comes next for LLMs x200 faster, x400 cheaper, 0 hallucination, no human in the loop - that's JEV, this is how LLMs will look like" in 36-minute tech talk, Jev Founder explained why RLHF isn't a thing anymore and how modern LLMs will be built this talk is worth more than a Stanford Machine Learning degree watch today no matter what, then learn how to become a Jev Engineer in the article below
Guidex.com
A 36-minute talk by TypeSafe’s founder, shared by Codez: why he thinks agents with no human in the loop come next, and how models like Jev are trained.

GitHubSocial feeds
Writing checked on separate named axes, each with its own verdict.
TypeSafeAI (community)
2

GitHubSecurity and abuse
The live Bluesky firehose, judged post by post, with a lane for humans.
Leo Mata
0~$0.00003darkzodchi
@zodchiii
Jev Founder (ex-OpenAI): "I believe JEV is the biggest breakthrough we've ever worked on This sounds too good to be true but it's beating everything" In 5 minutes, he breaks down why older LLMs were great at talking and terrible at deciding and building. Watch it and then read the guide below on how to use it at it's fullest 👇🏼
Guidex.com
A short clip shared by darkzodchi: TypeSafe’s founder on why older LLMs were good at talking and bad at deciding.

GitHubSecurity and abuse
A Telegram bot that deletes only the spam Jev is sure about.
Nikita Kolmogorov
7
GitHubSecurity and abuse
Input moderation for Mastra agents in one file.
CodeAlive
3~0.4 s
GitHubTrading and markets
Fed press conferences scored word by word, Jev against chat models.
SuperTurbo
0~150 msScott Williams
@swill1ams
Prediction: millionaires will be made using custom Jev style models (parallel constrained decoding) to make the agent systems companies already run more token efficient. Let me explain with a scenario: Imagine a company already has an agent workflow running where an llm reviews every item before it moves on: a support ticket gets triaged, an invoice gets approved or held, a claim gets flagged. Every one of those goes through a frontier model today, a few seconds and a few cents each, on the way to a decision that in most cases is obvious. Behind that flow sits years of humans (or agents) making the exact same call, with the outcome attached. Now imagine you first run each item through a custom PCD or similar model that costs a fraction of the llm and returns a classification of what to do at that step, with a mathematically accurate probability attached. When it's confident, the item skips the llm entirely. When it isn't, the llm handles it as normal. The model has seen years of your team making this exact decision, usually a constrained set of decisions, so it should be right most of the time. Say it comes back confident on 6 out of 10 items. That's more than half your llm spend potentially gone from that step, likely with comparable accuracy. This pre processing idea works in a bunch of other use cases too, such as: - model/request routing: cheap model, frontier model, or a human - picking which skill or subagent to load for a turn instead of stuffing the whole catalog into context - reranking retrieved context so only the relevant chunks reach the window - guardrails on every agent turn: contradictions, policy issues, prompt injection - extracting typed fields from unstructured data emails, PDFs and transcripts before anything expensive touches them Every one of those is a decision an llm makes today, that could potentially be done by another, cheaper model class. Very excited to see Jev/PCD-based pre processing use cases get deployed to agents at scale.
Guidex.com
Scott Williams on using parallel constrained decoding to make existing agent systems use fewer tokens.

GitHubSDKs and integrations
Ask a question about every row in SQL, and get a real SQL type back.
Colliber
22
GitHubSDKs and integrations
A PostgreSQL extension that calls Jev from SQL.
Giulio Piccolo
82
GitHubBenchmarks and evals
Where Jev holds up and where it breaks, with real API receipts.
Zaious
24Alex Volkov
@altryne
This is actually insane. This uses @typesafeai Jev model, as a plugin in Claude to review all the un-nesseasary tool calls, and it takes 1s to run! Like, literally, 1 second to take my Claude session from nearly 1M to ... 86K tokens! 😮 Ask your claude to install it and be amazed Use this prompt ``` Install, and configure : https://github.com/tamaratran/fast-jev-compaction ```
Guidex.com
Alex Volkov: a Claude session went from nearly 1M tokens to 86K in about one second.


GitHubTools and apps
A macOS utility that tells you which listening ports are safe to stop.
Epiphany Dynamics
0
GitHubSDKs and integrations
An unofficial Laravel package for Jev, with typed responses and test fakes.
Alexey (Butochnikov)
2梭哈.AI
@SUOHA_AI
连 JEV 的联合创始人 @CompleteSkeptic 都亲自下场转发点赞:这是 JEV 正确的打开方式! 大家在 Claude Code 里写长代码,最恶心的就是上下文一满,系统就卡住 10 秒去写总结小作文 开发者 @tamarajtran 刚刚开源了这个插件:利用 JEV 的打分能力,几十毫秒内精准识别并清空所有没用的终端垃圾与冗余日志 Github:https://github.com/tamaratran/fast-jev-compaction 它的作用是: • 彻底治好 Agent 失忆症:几千行终端废话和文件内容让 JEV 毫秒级打分,没用的直接扔,核心代码与状态 100% 原样保留 • 彻底消灭卡顿与账单:几十毫秒无感完成瘦身,不花一分钱废话 Token @typesafeai 的联合创始人 Diogo Almeida 也公开实名认可:这就是编码 Agent 绕过传统 KV 缓存的最佳解法🧐
Guidex.com
梭哈.AI’s write-up of Tamara Tran’s compaction plugin for Claude Code.

GitHubOpen source
A tiny Jev-like model on Qwen2.5-0.5B that trains and runs on a MacBook.
Jared Palmer
3k~160 ms
GitHubOpen source
Typed, calibrated decisions from any open-weights model, on your own GPU.
ikermoel
48
GitHubOpen source
An open 151M decision model on ModernBERT, with a WebGPU playground.
Hemant Kumar
68Erick
@ErickSky
Este tipo de herramientas empieza a hacer que el contexto de los agentes parezca menos una ventana limitada y más una memoria que se administra dinámicamente. [fast-jev-compaction] No resume, hace que Jev analice cada tool call y su resultado para decidir qué sigue siendo necesario. - Lo que importa se queda verbatim. - Lo que ya no aporta, se elimina. - Y los resultados que todavía pueden ser útiles permanecen intactos. Además: • Funciona como plugin de Claude Code • También puedes usarlo como librería npm • Las decisiones se toman sobre el contexto completo • Puede truncar resultados o eliminarlos junto con su llamada • Mantiene intactos los mensajes de usuario y assistant • Tiene fallback al compaction tradicional de Claude Code En otras palabras: En vez de resumir tu memoria, intenta podarla. REPOOO👇
Guidex.com
Erick on fast-jev-compaction: instead of summarising the context, Jev prunes it, keeping what matters word for word.
Kai
@hqmank
I rebuilt my job crawler with Jev. The task: start at a company's official homepage, find Careers, and identify jobs that match my profile. Before, with an LLM: ~5 minutes. After, with Jev: just over 20 seconds in my test. Every company organizes its website differently. Jev identifies the Careers entry point, chooses which links to follow, recognizes job pages, and scores each role against my profile. This is where Jev makes sense to me: automation that needs lots of small decisions, with faster responses and lower costs than calling an LLM at each step. Packaged it as a skill: jev-job-hunter. Demo below.
Kevin Wang
@mxfp4
everyone's making demos with Jev but nobody is making real products introducing lurk.so find and monitor reddit threads to get cited by AI > FREE > 4000 reddit threads scanned > email, discord, slack only possible to give for free bc of Jev & @getanyapi
Peter Wang
@the_cyw
I made a chrome extension to label all the X posts on my timeline. It tells me if each post is clean, engagement bait, promo, secondhand or filler. $0.03 for 1000 posts. Open sourced if you want to try it out.
Theo - t3.gg
@theo
This is a terrible compaction strategy that fundamentally doesn't understand how compaction and context management work. Seems like a lot of people are confused so let's break this down. 1. Compaction isn't a filter The role of compaction is to clean up history to keep the agent focused, not just deleting noise. It should be used sparingly when context gets too long, not constantly to keep context small. 2. Jev doesn't even know what it's deciding on! Models use the context of the thread to decide what to keep or not keep in a summary. This implementation goes through on a "line-by-line" (per tool call) basis to decide what should be left or deleted. Not only does this 32k token context model know very little of what happened before, but (in this implementation) it doesn't even know what the result of the tool call is! Deleting these things randomly will keep the model from knowing what it's tried and dooms you to end up in "stupid loops" where the model keeps trying the same thing over and over. 3. You're giving up the reasoning entirely Frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, XAI, and Google do not share reasoning traces over the API. They share encrypted payloads, which Jev cannot see (and often will drop). Anthropic is even stricter with this, requiring you to preserve the entire history in order to get any of the reasoning data. As a result, using this in Claude Code guarantees the model will act way dumber. 4. Models are tuned on their compaction flows For the last year, Frontier Labs have been including compaction and long runs as part of the training process. These models have learned ways to compact that are more effective than any rudimentary solution. Fun fact: If you switch models in Codex and compaction is necessary, compaction will run on the model that was previously used in the thread. 5. Cache writes are more expensive than cache reads. Cache writes are the biggest cost by far for agents. I often see cache write costs go over 60% of my total LLM spend in my personal use of Claude Code and Codex. Cache writes are insanely expensive when data earlier in the history is changed (because the old cache is invalidated when things change at the top). Every history edit requires a cache rewrite for ANY data past the history edit. If your history is "1,2,3,4,5,6" and you delete "2", you have to rewrite "3,4,5,6". This is more expensive than leaving "2" in the history. Good news. Since we're already killing all of the reasoning tokens by doing this stupid compaction strategy, the rewrite cost won't actually be that high because the model is missing so much data! 🙃🙃 6. The implementation is hot garbage. > "Whatever is not kept is deleted permanently, but the assistant can always re-run a tool or re-read a file." Good luck with that one. To be clear: this is a cool experiment and I find it genuinely interesting. That said, if you think this style of bs filtering on a probability threshold is actually a compaction strategy, I highly recommend you just use the defaults in tools like Claude Code and Codex. You're much less likely to hurt yourself that way.
Guidex.com
Theo on why per-tool-call filtering is not compaction: lost reasoning, higher cache-write costs and agents stuck in loops.
Higgsfield AI 🧩
@higgsfield_ai
Jev is really good at content filtering and asset selection. DeepSeek + Higgsfield turn the selected assets into ad creatives.
XAds and marketing
Ira Bodnar
@irabukht
Jev dropped the price of SEO/GEO fixes by 90% Agents that audit and fix a client's SEO/GEO used to cost us ~$250 Here's where the savings come from: 1/ 30x faster reads of Search Console and PostHog/Mixpanel data 2/ 30x faster checks of what ChatGPT searches on Bing 3/ 30x faster modeling of what users ask Gemini and Claude 4/ 30x faster scans of who ChatGPT and Claude cite 5/ 30x faster analysis of the sources behind those citations 6/ 30x faster gap analysis: why they get cited and we don't 7/ 30x faster fixes across 1,000s of pages on large client sites 8/ 30x faster sorting of which page types ChatGPT cites 9/ 20x faster creation of the pages that make ChatGPT pick you Available in the Ryze AI app and MCP/Claude Connector, link in the 1st comment 👇
Rob Hallam
@robj3d3
Jev just solved doomscrolling. You pick a niche, Jev reads 3 days of posts and asks 8 questions each. It runs in ~2s for $0.007 😅 > removes bait and hidden ads > judges the text and like/reply/repost ratios Free, no signup, go try it then touch grass ↓🌲
Guideyoutube.com/@GregIsenberg
Greg Isenberg and Ryan Vogel on the Startup Ideas Pod: what Jev is, the businesses it unlocks, and how to call it today through the Vercel AI Gateway.
Pierre-Eliott Lallemant
@pierreeliottlal
JEV is insanely fast. We gave it a massive dataset based on thousands of outreach messages and asked: Which intent signals generated the most booked demos? 40 seconds later, we had the answer. Cost: less than $0.20. JEV can also rank leads, measure prospect-message fit, and uncover what actually drives campaign performance. Coming soon to @GojiberryAI + MCP.
Ackerman
@Yarilo7brigada
jev is an insanely cool product Saw a post about jev and decided to check it out This thing is straight up gold whoever built it is a genius jev is the future Scanned over 700 live ads in 40seconds flat, and it cost me just 4 cents. If you're in marketing, this kind of crazy fast data crunching is hands down the best thing out there. Doing this through Opus 5 would run around 2 to 4.5 million tokens, set you back $15 to $50, and take anywhere from 10 minutes to an hour. That’s 200 to 500 times more expensive than Jev, and way slower.
Ira Bodnar
@irabukht
Jev killed 7 more SEO/GEO workflows 👇 1/ Assess which competitor pages to copy -> It scores every competitor page on answer, depth, proof and freshness, then checks its rank in Google and ChatGPT to show which ones are worth copying 2/ Identify which page elements to change to get cited -> It reads the title, meta, H1, FAQ and schema on every page and returns keep or change for each, with a confidence score 3/ Check if your pages answer what people ask AI -> It matches real buyer questions to your best page, which shows the questions you have no page for and who AI cites instead 4/ Rate how likely each page is to get cited -> Every URL gets a citation chance and the first fix to make, like adding a compare table 5/ Sort search terms -> It asks "is this query from a buyer?" across the full Search Console export, so you write only for terms that convert 6/ Build the internal link map -> For every page it checks the 15 closest candidates and links only the ones with an honest reason 7/ Verify AI-written pages -> Each draft goes through 20 yes/no checks, and only the ones that pass reach a human Available in the Ryze AI app and MCP/Claude Connector, link in the 1st comment 👇
Guideyoutube.com/@syntaxfm
CJ from Syntax explains how Jev works, then demos browser use, classification, code review, a model router and a chat bot with no LLM.
Marc Köhlbrugge
@marckohlbrugge
Using Jev to filter through my @wip todos It allows me to super quickly find all the instances where I increased revenue, got stuck, switched to a different SaaS provider, etc Things a regular keyword search would never catch
jaffa
@dsqjaffa
today i'm releasing Jev for content marketing. still doomscrolling to figure out what to post on social media? that's over now... Jev watches EVERY video in your niche and judges it before it ever reaches you: 1. research: pulls every video in your niche from a database of 12.8M viral videos 2. analyze: Jev watches, studies, and judges each one, the hooks, the formats, the angles, and why they worked 3. create: turns it into a data-backed script, based on proven winners (via Claude) no more guessing on TikTok & Instagram currently available for free in @virlomain + MCP. link below ↓
Nate Herk
@nateherk
Jev is tagging X posts in real time for me. Breaking, golden nugget, or slop.
XSocial feeds
Guideyoutube.com/@vogeldev
Ryan Vogel runs Jev on 100 and then 1,000 of his emails: category, priority, spam and reply predictions.
Movez
@0xMovez
I just built a Jev X Viral Post Analyser. 100,000 viral X posts. 20.4 seconds. $0.67. Claude Opus 5, same corpus, same clock, got through 214 posts and spent $0.98. per post that is ~680x cheaper the full Opus pass would have run $458. viral analysis is the perfect Jev job. • it is not writing, it is 14 yes/no calls per post: > does the hook open a loop, > is there a number in the first line, > is the proof real or claimed. classification, not prose. • what it found: 1,220 posts broke into the top 1%. baseline 1.22%. > superlative claim - 2.34% viral. 1.92x baseline > contrarian take - 1.59%. 1.31x > launch / tool drop - 1.46%. 1.19x and numbered lists, the thing everyone writes: 0.55%. below baseline. the most used hook is the least viral one. full stop. • what you are watching: left is the post under analysis, right is Jev answering 14 typed questions about it, each with a confidence score. the run stops at 20.4s because that is when Jev finished all 100k. pulled the corpus through a few X APIs, one parallel pass into Jev. should I drop it to public? Read my latest article on Jev Engineering below and turn your ideas into reality.
AI Builder Club
@aibuilderclub_
We turned Jev into a general browser skill for agents: jev-browser. Give it a website and a task. The browser opens automatically, and Jev decides every click based on what's on the screen. Here's a demo:
XAgents and browsers
Paulius 🏴☠️
@0xPaulius
Jev brought us closer to JARVIS it instantly does things like launch agents on a canvas - without awkawardly waiting for slowGPT LLM loop @clonkapp is now the fastest agent orchestrator on the planet
XAgents and browsers
Guideyoutube.com/@AICodeKing
AICodeKing tests support routing, refund detection, prompt-injection resistance and browser automation.
Hamed Valigholizadeh
@hametgholizadeh
JEV IS INSANE. I gave it 80 real exam questions and 297 practice ones. In 80 seconds, it told me which ones are most likely to appear on the real exam and which ones aren’t. All for $0.0256. Can't stop playing with @typesafeai 😁
Yum⋆₊˚
@yuhasbeentaken
Jev classified 1,315 X posts for about $0.086 in estimated model cost 😂 seeing everyone's Jev demos made me want to build something for my own content research. i'd collected a lot of posts, but figuring out what they had in common still meant opening them one by one and taking notes. so i built a dashboard around Jev. it labels each post across 8 dimensions, including topic, hook and writing style. now i can filter by topic and hook, compare engagement, and open the original posts to see the examples behind each pattern. my archive is a lot easier to learn from now.
keno
@kenonews
JEV makes competitor research feel like a cheat code. Give it your competitors’ ads. Break them down by hook, angle, offer and format. Then turn recurring combinations into a shortlist for your next creative test. From an endless swipe file to “here’s what we should try next.” Your competitors just became your creative department.
XAds and marketing
Guideyoutube.com/@retriever-ai
Retriever AI tests Jev on real browser tasks: where it worked, where it struggled, and how they will use it next to larger models.
Nick Khami
@skeptrune
you can make any open source model behave like jev with just a bit of inference engineering. it's shockingly easy. to prove it, we built a new endpoint we're calling deepseek-v4.1-flash-jev. see the demo below. here's how it's done: sglang (an inference engine) offers a scoring endpoint in addition to the normal generation one. in scoring mode, given an input & set of possible answers, it forces the model to produce probabilities for each one. example: > input: what is most common letter in abcccde? > possible answers: a, b, c > output: (c, 0.9), (b, 0.0.5), (a, 0.05) getting the above behavior instead of streamed output is as simple as using sglang's /v1/score endpoint instead of /generate. there's just one other trick required. for deepseek, you have to add a closing think tag before the response. this forces a direct answer instead of a reasoning trace. if you want reasoning, you can do that too, but imo that makes things too slow to be worth it. dsv4.1 flash is not as good as jev, but if we had enough spare compute to experiment with this same approach for a larger model then i think the decision quality would be at least as good, if not better. also, somewhat unrelated, i think decision-making models kill all prospecting & sourcing work. i would have absolutely killed to have jev or similar when i was recruiting @mintlify. absolutely incredible.
XOpen source
Florian Darroman
@floriandarroman
Jev is INSANE. I asked 100 Indie Hackers to build a post scheduler with: Jev vs Fable 5.1. The results are unexpected 🤯 (You can clearly see Jev is faster at doing stuff)
XBenchmarks and evals
t0t0
@t0t0_build
Un JEV me está monitoreando más de 25 grupos de whatsapp con clientes en tiempo real y evaluando si tengo que saber algo por urgencia problemas, pedidos irresueltos etc. Si tengo algo que saber, le avisa a una LLM que me escriba. 🔥
Guideyoutube.com/@NidhiSinghAttri
Nidhi Singh’s setup: one terminal, three AI subscriptions, and Jev picks the model for Claude Code, Codex and Cursor.
ares. 🎧
@aresotik
ESTA HERRAMIENTA ACABA DE ROMPER TODO EL MERCADO DEL AD SPY Maxfusion ha cogido JEV, el modelo nuevo de TypeSafe, y le ha metido la ad library entera de una marca → 1.891 anuncios clasificados → 19 segundos → 0,12 $ Y no es un resumen: cada anuncio etiquetado por etapa del funnel y estilo creativo, más la radiografía completa de la cuenta Llega pronto al MCP de maxfusion
Hiroyuki Ota (ほた)
@hota911
Jev にぷよぷよをさせてみた。 - 実行エンジンは https://github.com/puyoai/puyoai 。ゲームはリアルタイムで進行 - 盤面とそれぞれのポジションにおいたあとの結果を与え、①今どのフェーズか ②フェーズごとに、戦略からどの結果がベストか の1+3つの質問をして、選択肢を選ぶ 画像は Random に勝つ様子。決断が早いぶん Random も強い。 最初は盤面だけ渡して、単にどこにどの向きで落とすか判断させていたが弱すぎたので、配置後の結果を選ばせるようにしたり、戦略を渡したり、判断を多段化した結果なんとか3連鎖もでき Random に勝てるようになった。
Anusha
@acharyaagamya
I made a Magic Jev Ball for code reviews 🎱 Click it on any GitHub PR and ask: "should I approve this?" It checks CI, diff size, and reviews, then lets @typesafeai Jev decide your fate in ~200 ms No more thinking. Just shaking.
Guideyoutube.com/@avb_fj
Neural Breakdown with AVB takes Jev apart and looks at architectures for models that predict JSON. The video starts at 6:57.
Jiaqi Gu
@droidqw
github.com/droid-Q/jev-sk… ,基于 jev 的 skills 路由
GitHubRouting and model choice
Chris Adcock MD 🍊💊
@ChrisAdcockMD
Took Gregor’s Ultrafast idea and wired it into Grok Bot. @bot @OpenRouter @typesafeai @gregpr07 Your bots can now use Jev to drive the real Chrome on the machine instead of slow look-and-click. Drop in the API key you already have (OpenRouter or TypeSafe), and it gets going. It also walks your existing bot workflows and flags which decisions Jev can take over — the quick yes/no and “pick one of these options” calls — so you’re not guessing where it helps. Share link if you want to try it: https://x.ai/bot/sM_Xi4OF09cGU8KGyLvlC
XAgents and browsers
Geek Lite
@QingQ77
复刻 Jev 的并行决策思路,让 0.6B 小模型一次前向直接输出完整概率分布,不做输出 token 解码。 github.com/TianyuCodings/…
Guideyoutube.com/@TechBrewRideHome
A podcast segment on TypeSafe AI, its $40 million raise, and why the name is a nod to Jevons paradox.
Trinay Hari
@hari_trinay
Built a construction plan-set classifier with Jev. Proq turns civil and building plan sets into bills of materials using an LLM pipeline we built on GPT-4.1. Jev classified an entire 26-sheet plan set in 2.9 seconds for $0.0052. It matched GPT-4.1 and GPT-6 Astra on 100% of sheet-level classifications while running 17–21x cheaper and 5x faster than our production pipeline.
Sim Audience
@SimAudience
Jev is WILD I gave it two launch tweets and fed it over 4000 demographic profiles of real survey participants Twelve seconds later, a simulated A/B test tied to actual personas voting on the best tweet you can just do things i made it 100% free (link below)
Izzuddin
@Izzuddin_Shafi
1/8 Saw Jev from @typesafeai on my feed, so I made it play Pokemon Showdown. Codex built the harness. It was damn fast. Its choices were a mixed bag. Full match, video 1/2. This is a saved replay with decision data, latency and added reading pauses.
XGames and real time
Guideyoutube.com/@GaryExplains
Gary Explains on the catch: Jev understands natural language but it is not an LLM. It answers with structured values and a confidence level.
Saeed
@stringsaeed
built a highlighter on jev paste any language → my code tokenizes → jev names the lang, colours every word, then says which of 9 lint rules fire and where nine rules in code. jev just answers. near instant lab.saeed.sh/highlight
appcypher
@theappcypher
okay Jev is an INSANE unlock, I just gave Mario a multiverse. built "Mario Never Dies" with @typesafeai's Jev + microsandbox Jev picks every move and every time Mario dies, we fork the entire VM into 4 timelines and try again. whichever Mario survives becomes canon. it is like the others never happened.
ラプター | 高専 ロボコン ビジコン
@Raptor_zip
型付き意思決定AIモデル「Jev」で双腕ロボを動かした結果まとめてみた🦾 3層制御のうち意思決定(2層)をJevに任せ、IKや物理計算はコード側に分離する構造を作りました。500msの応答と0.5円/試行で早くて激安。
XRobotics and devices
Guideyoutube.com/@samwitteveenai
Sam Witteveen on System 1 thinking, then demos of Choice, Score and Noul, a practical example, and chained actions.
Ranjan
@manofsteel3129
built askjev on typesafe jev for all-site navigation with claude you talk to claude in plain english and askjev runs your real browser on any site. jev decides every next click — open pages, switch tabs, scroll feeds, fill forms, run multi-step goals without you babysitting the DOM. mcp server + chrome/brave extension. auto-connect once, then stay in chat while the browser moves. claude handles the conversation. jev handles the decision on each step. askjev is the hands on the web. install: load the extension → paste your typesafe key → auto-connect → restart claude → talk example: use askjev, open http://x.com and scroll my feed and find the best posts http://github.com/ranjan2829/AskJev npx -y askjev-mcp
GitHubAgents and browsers
Tamir
@TamirSPIRITT
introducing JevForm, a form that dynamically branches and chooses what to ask next usinng @typesafeai’s Jev in my life i’ve made hundreds of forms with crazy if/then logic. Jev solves it. built with @vercel json-render (by @ctatedev), so theoretically it can support any generative form UI, and @DavidKPiano’s xstate for the actual state Play with it here: https://jevform.spiritt.app/
Live siteUI
aniol
@0xaniol
today i built talkr, a speech analyzer using @typesafeai > talkr gives you a topic > you talk about it for 30s > jev analyzes your speech: pauses, filler words, repetitions, confidence, clarity > you get a score and feedback to improve can’t wait to 10x my speaking skills
Tonino Catapano (tonnoz)
@tonnoz
You still don't understand the use cases Jev unlocks. I've been waiting for something like this since early ChatGPT models. prediction: we will see the fastest-growing SaaS by MRR in history within the next month or two
Guidex.com
Tonino Catapano’s demo, and his prediction: the fastest-growing SaaS by MRR within a month or two.
Jason Lu
@jasonlu_ai
JEV is changes the world of E2E testing! Same eBay test flow, completed-run medians: Jev: 47s / $0.0067 GPT-5.6 Luna: 62s / $0.0277 Claude Sonnet 5: 79s / $0.4062 Try jev-e2e. github.com/perixtar/jev-e…
Chandramouly Kandachar
@chandamamz
@typesafeai's Jev controls the 2 hands and each finger to play the piano in real-time. Jev only "sees" what we see and plays this from the "note waterfall". It uses @browser_use's jev-ultrafast and some decision scheduling to make this happen in real-time. Sound on 🔈🔉🔊
XGames and real time
Ateeq
@TPateeq
I used Jev to solve a problem every agent eventually runs into: reading logs. 22.8M lines, and running an LLM on every one would've cost $1,120. Tocsin groups them into 11,812 repeating patterns, then asks Jev about each pattern once. 6 minutes, 64 cents, 123 patterns that actually needed to be looked at. http://github.com/TPAteeq/tocsin The paging policy is just a prompt. You tell it what should wake someone up at 3 am and what's just another log line.
Ian Nuttall
@iannuttall
Unsure how to get started with Jev? Install the skill: npx skills add typesafe-ai/skills --skill typesafe-ai Then prompt in your project: use /typesafe-ai to see how Jev can be used to replace slow, expensive LLM usage and find possible new features it would enable for users.
Guidex.com
Ian Nuttall: add the official skill, then run /typesafe-ai in your project to find where Jev can replace slow, expensive LLM calls.
Everton Carneiro
@everton_dev
I built a tool that finds App Store keywords by reading the competition, and uses Jev to judge them. What it actually does: 1. Turns the app's own listing into a handful of search queries, with Jev filtering out the ones nobody would type. 2. Runs those searches on the App Store. Whatever ranks is the candidate pool. 3. Jev judges each candidate: is this really an alternative to the app, or does it just share a word? The lookalikes get dropped. 4. The strongest survivors become the competitor set it mines for keywords. No competitor list to maintain, nothing hallucinated: competitors are whoever Apple already ranks, minus the ones Jev rules out.
XSEO and GEO
Aditya Singh
@xyz04274951
I made this for fun. Wired a mic over Fusion 360: click, speak, Fusion runs the feature. @typesafeai ‘s Jev only decides if the utterance is a command.
XRobotics and devices
Kun Chen
@kunchenguid
almost every day i hear people ask "when should i /compact my session" there's no easy answer because it depends on how likely your future action will need detailed context in the existing window but we have Jev now! introducing compact-adviser - an agent plugin you can use in claude and pi today to help determine whether you're likely at a task boundary that's safe to compact https://github.com/kunchenguid/compact-adviser i built a private eval set from 40 real sessions and manually labeled all the safe vs unsafe checkpoints to evaluate this, and hillclimbed the Jev prompt till it performed quite well i also made it so that the classifier will - optimize for precision (not triggering a compaction prematurely) when context window is small - and gradually shift to optimize for recall (not missing an opportunity to compact) when context window fills up, because the cost of not compacting becomes higher, and at the end the agent will be forced to compact anyway it supports a "hint" mode (just give you a hint and it's up to you to run /compact) vs "auto" mode which runs compaction whenever Jev says it's safe to do so if you have Jev and want to put your compaction on autopilot, try this out and let me know how it goes! support for more harness is coming soon as well
OpenRouter
@OpenRouter
Jev by @typesafeai is now on OpenRouter, in beta. Jev is a System One model. Instead of generating text, it takes your app's state plus a typed question and returns a typed decision with a probability attached. There is no JSON prompting, parsing layer, and nothing to validate against.
Guidex.com
Jev is live on OpenRouter in beta: app state and a typed question in, a typed decision with a probability out.
271Stars
Sutro
128Stars
Jun Uehara
87Stars
savka777
Cloudflare Developers
@CloudflareDev
Jev from @typesafeai is now live on @CloudflareDev AI Gateway. Try the first System One model — send state and typed questions; get structured answers your code can use directly. developers.cloudflare.com/ai/models/type…
Guidex.com
Cloudflare’s announcement: send state and typed questions, get structured answers your code can use directly.
39Stars
Okina Audio
151MSize · 77.10% accuracy
GitHubOpen source
A 151M non-autoregressive decision engine, with its numbers published.
Heman10x
255Web Dev Cody
12Guidenetlify.com
Netlify’s changelog: Jev through its AI Gateway with zero configuration.
60Stars
yikangy873
123,805Requests · $12.69 cost
GitHubBenchmarks and evals
Nine experiments and 28 predictions, all fixed before any data.
Will Kelly
0Andrue Anderson
2Guidedocs.litellm.ai
LiteLLM’s pass-through docs for calling TypeSafe from an existing LiteLLM proxy.
russfranky
1Shuhan Sun
4GitHubAgents and browsers
Voice control for macOS where Jev is the fallback, not the router.
Coco Research
2
Guidepydantic.dev
Pydantic AI’s docs for the native TypeSafe model, to call Jev from a Pydantic AI agent.
GitHubRouting and model choice
A Claude Code and Codex skill that picks the model for a prompt.
heyman333
1Joel Lewis
0Andy Holst
0Guidepypi.org
The LangChain package with TypeSafeClassifier, to use Jev inside a LangChain app.
Ngoc Phan
0496Stars
GitHubGames and real time
An Astra planner with Jev as the controller, playing Minecraft.
rmalde
Milind S
@milindlabs
Aaaaaand this is now open-source here: A tiny AI pointer companion for your Mac driven by JEV or Gemini Live - Bring your own keys - Local OmniParser running on CoreML - Jev drives the pointer - Ctrl + K to type a task Voice mode next if people want it! https://github.com/milind-soni/tiptour-macos

Guidegithub.com
Rajeeve Kuriakose’s runnable Jev examples, through OpenRouter, so you can start today.
175Stars
a bo
80Games · 0 wrong moves per 1k · ~$0.0015 cost per game
GitHubGames and real time
Jev played 80 games in a chess benchmark and made no illegal move.
Maxim Saplin
131127Stars
WquGuru
Matt Van Horn
@mvanhorn
WTF is Jev by @typesafeai? Here’s the tl;dr ELI5: Think AI multiple choice, not AI essay writing. It doesn’t chat. It makes decisions your software can act on: “Spam or not?” “Which tool should this agent use?” “Does this need a human?” The exciting part: roughly 200x faster and 400x cheaper than frontier LLMs in TypeSafe’s own workflow benchmarks, with responses in a fraction of a second. Why that’s powerful: imagine an app or agent making hundreds of little judgment calls without hundreds of expensive, slow conversations with an LLM. Keep the big model for the hard thinking and writing. Use Jev for the rapid-fire decisions in between. Excited to dig in.
Guidex.com
Matt Van Horn: think AI multiple choice, not AI essay writing. Keep the big model for the hard thinking.
146Stars
GitHubInbox and support
Reads a WeChat thread and scores emotion, intent and reply quality.
FerryCorleone
90Stars
GitHubRouting and model choice
A structured decision plugin for agent harnesses, built on Jev.
Devin-AXIS
47Stars
Nassim Arifette
Isaac Flath
@isaac_flath
I've been using Jev by @typesafeai Here's the six things i've tried and am confident I'll still use Jev for 60 days from now. There's many more experiments, ideas, and things I think I will use it for. It's a big deal (more on why in next post). But I am only sharing things that I am 99% sure will lead to stuff I will still be using Jev for in 60 days. That means I started with small, boring, but useful, stuff. - Fact-checking my scripts - Ranking my news feed - Finding the right text in PDFs - Checking citations - Grouping my review notes - Figuring out why agents fail (eval over traces) https://isaacflath.com/writing/six-things-i-tried-with-jev
Guidex.com
Isaac Flath’s shortlist: fact-checking scripts, ranking a news feed, finding text in PDFs, checking citations, grouping notes, and evals over agent traces.
84Stars
Kyle Pena
74Stars
SiliconLabAI
14Stars
GitHubRouting and model choice
A Pareto-optimal OpenRouter router for Pi, decided by Jev.
Philipp D. Dubach
Kostas
@Kostastsale
This made me rethink where AI actually fits into security engineering. For purely engineering work, forget about ChatGPT or Claude. TypeSafe AI just released Jev, and I think it’s going to change how we build AI into security workflows. Instead of asking an LLM to “investigate this,” you define the questions and possible outputs, then get structured probabilities and decisions your code can actually use. For security, the possibilities are huge. Think of the below use cases 🤯: Threat Hunting: ➡️ Rank broad hunt results by relevance ➡️ Score users, hosts, processes, or sessions based on how suspicious their surrounding activity looks ➡️ Classify noisy activity at scale. Think thousands of rundll32.exe executions automatically grouped into expected admin activity, software execution, suspicious usage, or unknown Detection Engineering: → Classify historical alerts for FP analysis → Add context-aware scoring on top of deterministic detections → Validate whether an alert actually supports the behavior the rule claims to detect Incident Response: → Reduce massive timelines down to the events most relevant to the intrusion → Continuously score hosts/users for possible compromise → Help prioritize scope expansion, triage, and response decisions This feels much closer to how AI should be integrated into security engineering. I'm currently working through most of the above, mostly focusing on instant response, but at the same time doing some of the threat hunting use cases that I mentioned. Typesafe AI can be basically a decision engine sitting inside the workflow while being x200 fast and cheaper. Don’t sleep on this... This is huge! 👉 https://typesafe.ai/
Guidex.com
Kostas on threat hunting with Jev: define the questions and outputs, then rank, score and classify activity at scale.
18Stars
0xBakeer
17Stars
Raymond Hughes
35Stars
ZeroGold
Jason Zhu
@GoSailGlobal
拿 Jev 做搜索重排,我先泼一盆冷水:单独用,它没打赢向量检索 TypeSafe 的 Jev 这阵子很火,一堆项目拿它做重排。我们在 Agent Skills Hub 的 33,047 条目录上认真测了一次,164 条中英文真实查询,9,831 对分级标注,整套只花了 2.6 美元 三个结论 01|单独重排,约等于没赢 Jev 重排 bge-m3 的前 30 条,NDCG@10 只多了 0.012,置信区间跨过零。MRR 和前三命中率倒是涨得明显,它很会把最强的那一条顶到第一,后面几条基本是重新洗牌 02|裁判偏差,被我们量出来了 Jev 自己也参与了打标注,这就是循环 只用 Jev 当裁判,它领先 0.053 两个裁判合并,领先 0.012 只用 Haiku 当裁判,反而落后 0.028 同一组比较,换个裁判结论直接翻面。所有涉及 Jev 的结论,我们只认 Haiku 那一列 03|真正稳赢的是融合 把 Jev 和 bge-m3 的排序做 RRF 融合,NDCG@10 到 0.864,比纯向量高 0.064 到 0.116,三种裁判下都成立。代价是每次查询多一次 API 调用,约 0.0002 美元 顺便暴露了我们自己的问题:Hub 线上 CLI 用的关键词排序只有 0.609,短板是召回。相关结果有一半压根没进候选,后面怎么重排都救不回来 数据、标注、每条查询的得分全部开源,不用 API key 就能复现打分
Guidex.com
Jason Zhu tested Jev reranking on 164 real queries. Alone it did not clearly beat vector search; fused with it, it did. In Chinese.
32Stars
GitHubSDKs and integrations
Jev as a Spring Boot 4 starter, over Spring MVC and RestClient.
Dan Vega
15Stars
Niaz Morshed