855 projects, posts and guides about Jev, the System One model from TypeSafe AI. Each entry links to its source and shows the cost and speed its author reported.
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
Matt Canham’s X article, written for everyone who read the launch posts and still did not get it.
Alan Daitch
@AlanDaitch
Puse a Jev, la nueva IA de @typesafeai, a jugar al Tetris en modo súper difícil.
Decidió cada jugada en unos 0,3 segundos. Acomodó 357 piezas e hizo 134 líneas en solo 2 minutos.
Increíble.
I built real-time Clippy with Jev.
It quietly watches how you use the product and only wakes up when it thinks you’re struggling.
Hesitating? Confused? Stuck? Clippy knows.
Even its reactions are controlled by Jev. 👀
Research, testing, publishing, demand and analysis — each with builds whose authors published the cost. 700 leads scored for $0.09, 100,000 posts analysed for $0.67.
Raihan Khan
@raihankhan_rk
I got access to Jev by @typesafeai today morning and I built a cool use case for it
Introducing DiffJury - simply paste any public PR link and Jev tells you immediately if it's safe to merge or does it require review ✅
🔗 Feel free to try it out here - http://diffjury.up.railway.app
Imagine Jev being able to tell you if you should merge a PR with grounded context of your codebase. that's what we're building at @graphify 👀
It's fascinating how insanely fast Jev is... the model architecture in itself is quite interesting and this has opened up a plethora of new use cases and I'm sure the internet will pick up on it sooner than anyone'd expect
Jev made our Slack agent 2x faster ⚡️
Our agent can be quite slow because it needs to read skills and figure out which tools to call.
We used @typesafeai's new model to speed this up by first passing it the prompt and classifying the best skill, tool and params to use before handing it to the agent
I built a voice controlled computer-use for my mac using @typesafeai's Jev and it's INSANE how fast it is!
I can dictate "open the notes app and create..." and the app opens before I even finish my sentence.
TypeSafe’s launch post: the model, the evals, and their caveats.
Max Blade
@_MaxBlade
Ai is evolving.
Jev can be armed at all times.
I can speak freely and it knows ( from probabilities ) if im asking my computer to do something or blaberring away at something else.
no wake word.
speed + affordability + intelligence is getting to the point where an always on ambient jarvis style assistant is possible.
Im loving where we are going.
CNVS is still the future of vibecoding.
Jev is really good at intent-based search!
How it looks in Gmail:
(for a huge inbox you'd prob let semantic search / embeddings pull first but still much better experience)
Jev in search and RAG, by job: route the query, rerank the shortlist, filter passages before the writer. The per-query costs builders published, and a test it lost.
iagolast
@iagolast
Caso de uso de @typesafeai: Revisar todas las facturas de la empresa y clasificarlas contablemente en segundos 🫠
e2e + jev from @typesafeai ⚡
I'm building an open-source framework for running e2e tests with agents. supports web, mobile (and more!)
available soon: tester.army/e2e
building a computer assistant with Jev
local whisper listens to everything I say which then gets classified by Jev to determine what actions to take
it uses a small Swift app to provide the full accessibility tree to Jev (i.e. tell its what's on my screen, what can be clicked, etc)
still super early, but promising and all real-time
which Jev was also local though. then it would be completely private
The GitHub awesome list for Jev: use cases, projects, SDKs, tools and learning resources, with pricing, limits and a quick start.
Wayne Sutton
@waynesutton
Ask Jev anything. Give it a try at askjev.ai
It won't answer. It will judge.
Let's see if we can get to 1 million questions.
@typesafeai 🤝 @convex work great together.
@hmartenjoyer @CompleteSkeptic @justKDeng @mikeysee
First @typesafeai use case, live in our Mac app: setup and troubleshooting help when no model is loaded.
Model downloading, load failed, API returning 503, phone won't pair: the user asks, Jev reads the question with the whole built-in manual as state and decides, with probabilities, what it is and which article answers it, or that nothing does. The app then shows the real documentation and live status. Jev decides, the app answers from its own docs. No model loaded, nothing invented.
42/42 on a held-out set: paraphrases, typos, French, German, Spanish, features that don't exist, follow-ups. Median 0.93 s.
Great breakthrough by the TypeSafe team. Thank you.
Classify with Jev at the costs builders published: 1,018 papers for $0.08, 1,000 posts for $0.03. Choice, Noul or Score, many labels per call, and when to hand off.
Eric Zhang
@ekzhang1
Inspired by @typesafeai , here is a Jev-compatible public API to play with
It runs a comparable open model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B), and just uses SGLang radix cache to preserve the prefill reuse / really fast parallel systemone generation - 64 tasks in <1s.
github.com/ekzhang/openje…
everything you need to start building with jev, in one article.
code, architecture, diagrams... everything you need to follow the build and make it your own.
Avid’s builder’s guide, and the fullest public write-up of the pattern: where the decision layer sits in a coding harness, the five rules that keep it enforceable, and keel, the Rust app it was built in. Honest about the self-improvement part it has not proved.
😎Nick 常胜
@isNickMa
Tested TypeSafe’s Jev (no-text, probability-only model) as an AI agent safety monitor.
Checking each action first worked well caught most attacks with almost no false blocks, and much faster than Gemini.
Using Jev in place of an LLM judge: 1,709 editorial judgments for under a cent, a social post judged for $0.00003, and what the confidence score is and is not. Where it beats a generative judge, and where it must not be one.
cyril on where the 200× and 400× headline figures come from and why they are a ceiling rather than a typical result: 31 bounded checks counted in one real session, and the decision-point audit that finds yours.