Routers that let Jev pick the model, the tool or the skill before the agent starts, with the latency and cost saving each author measured.
66 builds · page 2 of 3
Vadim Choi
@vadimchoi
$10k/month just to decide which agent should answer.
not to answer. to decide.
group chat + @mentions: fast, cheap, terrible UX.
an LLM orchestrator: nice UX, 4-7s and $0.00046 a message.
@typesafeai jev: 0.29s median, $0.00002.
same decision, $20/month.
Most AI models are built to generate.
But Jev is trying something different:
Don’t generate. Decide.
Give it some context and a specific question, and it returns a structured decision with a probability.
I found this interesting for things like model routing, agent workflows, tool safety and RAG.
The idea is simple --Instead of calling a big LLM for every small decision, let your code handle the workflow and use a smaller model where human-like judgment is actually needed.
Honestly, this feels like an interesting direction for AI systems.
Introducing Jev + OpenRouter + tools.
You can now use Jev with 2,000 tools on Monid. Your agent picks the tools, Jev speeds the work up 30x.
> Score 2,000 leads
> Scan the TikTok viral video hooks
> Research fundraising of 200 companies
> Audit a site's SEO and rebuild the internal links on every page
> Sort every Reddit thread about your category
Jev picks the model and the thinking effort for every Codex turn.
NNatoshi
273
mercante
@merccante
GROK 4.7 IS $2/$6 IN CURSOR. Jev now decides if the model even wakes up
same sticker as 4.6. live in Cursor and Grok Build.
CursorBench 4.0: 46.3. DeepSWE v1.1: 71.0. Terminal-Bench 4.0: 37.6.
the loop: repo state → Jev Noul/Choice/Score → allow / ask / skip → only then grok-4.7
1 → dump the tool call as state, not a prompt essay
2 → Jev Noul: is this user-requested
3 → Jev Score: blast radius 0-3
4 → Jev Choice: allow, ask, or skip
5 → hard rules still veto. model never gets last word
6 → shadow 200 tool calls. log pick vs what 4.7 would have billed
7 → flip live. you still approve the risky ones
no auto-merge. no wallet. no "just send every bash to Fable"
result: Jev on OpenRouter is $0.042/MTok in, output free, p50 ~270ms
a ~1k-token gate is about $0.00004. 4.7 stays $2/$6 for the work that survives
Vercel Jev promo ends Sep 25
the EXACT system is in the article below
bon un peu de serieux, jev peut etre vraiment utile...
pour préparer un workflow de qualification de leads après un audit client, je veux un premier tri de ce que l’agent propose avant de mettre les étapes dans Obsidian.
j’ai donné à Jev le contexte de qualification avec les étapes candidates. À lui de choisir pour chacune : retenir, clarifier ou écarter.
sur cet appel API, il retient la qualification par téléphone et le rappel des prospects injoignables. Par contre le rappel à J+2 ressort « à clarifier » : le contexte fourni ne fixe aucun délai. L’enrichissement LinkedIn est écarté, il était hors périmètre.
la première image, c’est sa réponse réelle avec les probabilités. La deuxième, le workflow qu’on en a tiré, avec le délai toujours à confirmer.
dans mon process, je garde la main sur cette présélection : je vérifie et je valide avant de l’intégrer à l’audit. Voilà où je vois l’intérêt de Jev dans mon taf.
After seeing so much Hype around Jev, I started using it inside my Hermes as a decision and routing mechanism for a AI video pipeline I was working on
But now, I am Changing that thought.
Laya is a 421M local decision model by @Nandakishorm1 .
Same job as Jev -> choice, score, yes/no with a probability,
But it runs on my machine. No API hop. No per-token meter. ~33ms. Weights stay here.
For an AI film pipeline, that is the actual bottleneck.
>Not “write a better prompt.”
>The expensive part is sending the wrong shot to the wrong generator.
Before Seedance / Kling / Minimax / Veo / Flux / GPT Image burns a credit, Laya now answers four things in one pass:
→ which model gets this shot
→ text-only, character-ref, or first-frame
→ is the brief ready, or does the enhancer skill run first
→ how hard is identity lock
Sol still writes. Kimi still helps. Video models still generate. Laya only decides.
Jev was a good hosted nervous system. For shot routing I don’t need a hosted brain.
I need a local one that sits in front of the generate button and says go / wait / switch model.
421M. Local first. That is the router now.
botei o jev no codexrouter, sinto o trabalho muito mais otimizado, vou criar um harness personalizado para o codexrouter, sinto que da pra fazer muitas melhorias nesse fluxo
o jev por enquanto no codexrouter está com poucas funções
As Jev (@typesafeai) is the talk of the town, and people are having fun finding new use cases for it.
I built a real-time demo of smart AI agent routing for anyone working on AI tools, agents, or products.
this is what I have done for one of my project.
https://youtu.be/c8qV0f4XnRY
Holy crap, who the hell did this?!!
Someone open-sourced a Jev-powered second brain for AI agents and lets you plug it straight into your own agent.
GitHub's already at 925 stars, repo's called Hermes-Jev-Skills.
You just run one install command, and Jev takes over every tiny decision your agent burns premium tokens on.
Which model answers, which skill to load, which memories matter, what survives when context gets cut.
Give it your computer or browser and it'll pick the next click, but only from actions you already marked safe. It'll sort your inbox into lanes, strip hidden prompt injections out of search results, and triage every message in ~0.4 seconds. Claude Code and Codex support - they threw that in too.
No dependencies, no patching Hermes core, and your API key never touches the agent
Link's right here: http://github.com/kerpopule/hermes-jev-skills
The catch? Jev itself is a paid cloud API.
The skills run on your machine; the decisions don't.
But hey, a decision costs a fraction of a cent, everything fails open if Jev goes down, and your expensive model finally gets to do only the thinking. Who needs a damn frontier model picking which file to open!
Typed IntentSpec contracts as the input layer for routers.
Aangel291592
652
Oliver Prompts
@oliviscusAI
grok 4.7 thinks. jev reacts. together, one ai agent now thinks twice before every move, and pays a fraction of the price for it.
grok-jev-reflex is a free, open source router that pairs the two:
grok 4.7 plans and acts, jev makes the cheap yes/no calls in between, at $0.042 per million tokens, answered in about 239ms.
> 25 tools sent on every call, cut down to 8
> first prompt: 17.8k tokens → 9.5k tokens
> bill: up to 40% less, same speed
> numbers measured independently on xAI's grok build
setup is 5 messages, no code, about 7 minutes: make a key, install, add one rule, run a shadow day watching only, then go live.
jev can only make the agent do less or ask more, it can never approve anything irreversible on its own.
100% free. open source.
i created a 404 page that fixes your typos for you, and redirects you to the correct page
built with @typesafeai jev
try it out: kobra.systems/cmr-table
اولین تجربهی خودم با JEV 👀
این تجربه برای ۳ روز پیشه؛ وقتی JEV هنوز توی حالت Waiting List بود.
من کلاً هر ابزاری که سختافزارم بتونه بکشه رو تست میکنم 😄
برای همین توکن JEV رو از OpenRouter گرفتم و به Grok Bot دادم.
ماجرا چی بود؟
از GITEX کلی ویدیو گرفته بودم و نمیدونستم کدومها رو اول منتشر کنم. از اون طرف هم برای هرکدوم کلی کاور طراحی کرده بودم و واقعاً حوصله انتخاب و مرتبکردنشون رو نداشتم 😂
به JEV گفتم:
«خودت انتخاب کن، دستهبندی کن و فولدربندیشون کن.»
در کمتر از چند دقیقه همهچیز رو مرتب کرد و حتی پیشنهاد داد کدوم ویدیوها رو اول منتشر کنم.
Grok Bot هم بقیهی توضیحات و تحلیلها رو انجام داد.
برای اولین تجربه، واقعاً از JEV راضی بودم 🔥
هنوز Laya-Max چینی رو هم تست نکردم؛ نصبش هنوز تموم نشده.
اونم که آماده شد، تجربهام رو میگم 👀
TanStack AI just shipped subagents.
Jev picks which models / agents should run for the task, in parallel, in sequence, or mixed.
Best Jev use case I've seen so far.
TanStack team cooked. 🔥
built this skill-picker for myself because apparently having 30+ agent skills also means remembering which one does what 😭
jev (@typesafeai), being the god that it is, ranks them for a given task and tells me and my agents which skills are actually worth using
phew. one less thing for my brain to cache.
https://github.com/MuskanPaliwal/skill-picker
Just trained Tev1 0.8B, a tiny Jev-like classifier.
Here it is running completely locally on my mac with @ollama & classifying some tasks.
It's extremely fast: only ~50ms E2E latency. Video is not sped up!
Releasing weights & benchmarks very soon so you can try it yourself :)
Introducing typesafe/jev-router: a cache-aware model router powered by Jev and @typesafeai
The Jev Router picks the best model and reasoning effort for each request, balancing quality, speed, and cost.
Here's how it works 👇🏻
A frozen Qwen3-0.6B plus a 1.1 MB head for tool selection.
Ssamatv256
~1.1 MB
Gipp 🦅
@gippp69
Jev builders: the model bill is decided before the model is called
/routing
20,000 events/day become:
→ 14,000 die as noise
→ 4,700 become logs
→ 800 earn a draft
→ 500 go to human review
only 4% reaches writing. Jev costs $0.84; the full loop lands at $29.04.
optimize the 4% before the writer.
I built a query layer that automatically routes the queries to one of the configured query engines using Jev, all running on top of Iceberg.
Fast decision models unlock interesting use cases indeed.
Should we open-source this?
Having some fun doing my own Grok Bot @bot ( Dots, Muse ) alternative with @tan_stack start, @pidotdev + @Cloudflare durable objects! 💅
- Multi-harness Support
- Multi Decision Room Routing ( Jev, LLM Judge, Roundtable )
- Memory for Bots, Rooms & Global
- Reactions 👍
- Daemon runs locally + web on cloudflare
- File Support with R2, Room data & Bot Data exportable on CF durable.
Will open-source next week hopefully, so give a follow & stay tunned.
I was going to use some open-source alternatives or fork them, but most of them are damn sloppy, my ideia is to use this for myself since OpenClaw & Hermes lack group collaboration & a proper mobile / responsive design. Dots is not available in EU, Grok is "locked" to grok models but for me its still the best in terms of UX/UI overall so congrats to Cursor & Xai Team :p
Found this pretty interesting repo: herdr + jev = agent router
You give it a coding task, and it routes it to the right agent + model + reasoning effort based on the task and your available quota.
Supports Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode.
Basically a load balancer for your coding agents.
https://github.com/nidhi-singh02/agent-router
Thanks @nidhisinghattri
Let your app choose the right model, tool, or action in near real-time with Decisions API, now available to all developers in public beta.
The Decisions API makes decisions up to 10x faster than GPT-6 Luna through the Responses API.
New: Decision Model Rankings!
See the spend share and token share of different decision models and task types, including Relevance, Correctness, Instruction Following and more.
@typesafeai is leading all categories today.
Launching Decision models on @useRouterPlus. You can now use various system 1 decision models such as Jev, @perplexity_ai Decider, @bespokelabsai Nimble, Mercury Decide, Clef, Kev 4B and Decider 2B with 3 models free !!
app.routerplus.com/playground
Jev sets the reasoning effort for GPT-6 during Codex tasks.
Mmiuuyy
305
Satya Nadella
@satyanadella
Introducing Microsoft-Decision-1, our new model for fast decision-making.
It delivers top performance on structured decision tasks, outperforming both LLMs and other decision models in latency and quality.
We’re already testing it across Microsoft for everything from incident response and quality control to scientific discovery.