Do check out this public repo (github.com/M37Labs/laya-m…) by @m37labs for those interested in understanding Laya-MLX, a new kind of encoder-only architecture and its application. Emerging systems like Jev, Laya can serve as a `System 1` brain in different implementations.
After seeing so much Hype around Jev, I started using it inside my Hermes as a decision and routing mechanism for a AI video pipeline I was working on
But now, I am Changing that thought.
Laya is a 421M local decision model by @Nandakishorm1 .
Same job as Jev -> choice, score, yes/no with a probability,
But it runs on my machine. No API hop. No per-token meter. ~33ms. Weights stay here.
For an AI film pipeline, that is the actual bottleneck.
>Not “write a better prompt.”
>The expensive part is sending the wrong shot to the wrong generator.
Before Seedance / Kling / Minimax / Veo / Flux / GPT Image burns a credit, Laya now answers four things in one pass:
→ which model gets this shot
→ text-only, character-ref, or first-frame
→ is the brief ready, or does the enhancer skill run first
→ how hard is identity lock
Sol still writes. Kimi still helps. Video models still generate. Laya only decides.
Jev was a good hosted nervous system. For shot routing I don’t need a hosted brain.
I need a local one that sits in front of the generate button and says go / wait / switch model.
421M. Local first. That is the router now.
🥊Laya vs Jev
He diseñado un experimento para probar que modelo es mejor, si Jev o Laya, y lo hice poniendolos a jugar ajedrez.
La verdad es que ambos son bastante tontos para esto, y no va de mejorar prompts, aunque seguiré probando algunas formas de mejorar las partidas.