X post · by Movez
100,000 viral posts in 20.4 seconds
Fourteen yes-or-no calls per post, for 67 cents.
Movez
@0xMovez
I just built a Jev X Viral Post Analyser. 100,000 viral X posts. 20.4 seconds. $0.67. Claude Opus 5, same corpus, same clock, got through 214 posts and spent $0.98. per post that is ~680x cheaper the full Opus pass would have run $458. viral analysis is the perfect Jev job. • it is not writing, it is 14 yes/no calls per post: > does the hook open a loop, > is there a number in the first line, > is the proof real or claimed. classification, not prose. • what it found: 1,220 posts broke into the top 1%. baseline 1.22%. > superlative claim - 2.34% viral. 1.92x baseline > contrarian take - 1.59%. 1.31x > launch / tool drop - 1.46%. 1.19x and numbered lists, the thing everyone writes: 0.55%. below baseline. the most used hook is the least viral one. full stop. • what you are watching: left is the post under analysis, right is Jev answering 14 typed questions about it, each with a confidence score. the run stops at 20.4s because that is when Jev finished all 100k. pulled the corpus through a few X APIs, one parallel pass into Jev. should I drop it to public? Read my latest article on Jev Engineering below and turn your ideas into reality.
Sep 19, 2026 · 216 likesOpen on X
Movez ran 100,000 viral X posts through Jev with 14 yes-or-no questions each: does the hook open a loop, is there a number in the first line, is the proof real or claimed. The pass took 20.4 seconds and $0.67. Claude Opus 5 on the same corpus and clock got through 214 posts for $0.98, which he puts at about 680 times the cost per post. The run found superlative claims going viral at 2.34% against a 1.22% baseline, and numbered lists below baseline at 0.55%.
Open the source
