EmDash moderates its plugin registry with Clef

More like this

• 

  Automater

  @automater_ai

  Claude Code Jev as MCP tools the agent can skip is not a gate. Put it in a PreToolUse hook that fails closed, with deny rules behind it. automater.ai/intel/jev-clau…

  

  Article·Security and abuse

  A Jev gate belongs in a hook, not MCP

• 

  Hassan

  @nutlope

  Jev + Kimi K3 for fraud detection! TLDR: Jev classified 100 emails in 1.42 seconds, then I routed the uncertain cases to Kimi K3. The full pipeline got 96/100 correct for only ~$0.07. Video is not sped up, check out the live run! Here was my process: I gave Jev 100 emails to classify (a mix of 50 legit & 50 fraudelent emails). It classified all of them in 1.42 seconds. An underrated feature about Jev is it will give you the confidence score for a classification, so I routed any prediction under 95% confidence to Kimi K3 to be fully sure. 31 emails fell below that threshold. After routing those to Kimi K3, the combined pipeline reached 96% accuracy. The full run took 16 seconds & ~$0.07 in inference costs: - $0.068 from Kimi K3 on @togethercompute - $0.003 (1/3 of a cent) from Jev on @typesafeai. I think this is a really interesting pattern: use a fast specialized model like Jev for the narrow task, then route the uncertain cases to a larger LLM. I feel like this kind of approach could be a game changer for use cases like fraud or anything realtime. You can use the speed & low cost of Jev while having a larger LLM as a fallback to ensure high accuracy.

  

  X·Security and abuse

  Pick

  Fraud detection with Jev and Kimi K3

  Emails

  100 in 1.42 s

  Correct

  96/100

  Cost

  ~$0.07 pipeline ($0.003 Jev, $0.068 Kimi K3)

• 

  😎Nick 常胜

  @isNickMa

  Tested TypeSafe’s Jev (no-text, probability-only model) as an AI agent safety monitor. Checking each action first worked well caught most attacks with almost no false blocks, and much faster than Gemini.

  

  X·Security and abuse

  Jev as an agent safety monitor