Skip to content
Made with Jev

X · found by @nishitkhalpada

Adaptive Traffic Signal Control vs Fixed Timing Simulation

Simulation compares adaptive signal decisions using queue sizes and wait times against a fixed 8-second cycle across varying traffic conditions

Jev judged this in 261 ms for $0.00006

Nishit Khalpada

@nishitkhalpada

I wanted to understand where Jev actually helps, so I built a small traffic simulation with GPT-6 Astra handling the build and Jev making the traffic decisions. One side uses a normal fixed 8-second signal cycle. The other side lets Jev decide whether to keep the current green or switch based on queue sizes, wait times, recent arrivals, and traffic trends. Both sides get the exact same cars and follow the same movement rules. What I found interesting is that Jev doesn’t always win. Fixed timing works really well when traffic is balanced. Jev starts doing better when traffic becomes uneven or keeps changing. The video is the heavy-traffic run. I’ll add the Light, Moderate, and Heavy results, along with the code, in the replies.

Sep 20, 2026 · 0 likesOpen on X

Found something worth sharing?

Drop the link and Jev reads it on the spot. What belongs lands in the community feed with your name on it.

Submit a find

More from the community

  • Live siteGames and real time

    Bluff Card Game with AI Opponents

    Play the classic Indian card game Bluff, also called Cheat, against AI opponents who decide whether to call your bluff

    @Ashaa___

    Jev · 244ms
  • Daniel Alfasi

    @alfasiii

    Well… I guess you saw that one coming 😅 Jev is playing Pokémon now — walking and fighting through FireRed. It doesn’t mash buttons tile by tile. @typesafeai @CompleteSkeptic github.com/daniel4x/JevEm…

    XGames and real time

    AI plays Pokémon FireRed with human-like movement and battles

    @alfasiii

    Jev · 354ms