822 projects, posts and guides about Jev, the System One model from TypeSafe AI. Each entry links to its source and shows the cost and speed its author reported.
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
Jev can serve as better natural language search on websites.
It can scan thousands of Zillow listings and classify properties by things you can't normally filter for - e.g. architecture, renovation status, proximity to freeways.
This was done in <20 sec and costs $0.18 👇
Breaking: Browser Use + Jev = Ultrafast ⚡
Findings flights took 7s and cost only $0.0039 🤯
> new action space every step
> DOM state space
> small LLM fallback to type
(this video is at 1x speed btw)
Built a tiny open source browser agent. try it below ↓
I built a browser extension with Jev @typesafeai that can hide/collapse posts on X based on natural language.
It's so fast that it's not noticeable and insanely cheap...this must be the future of "ad blockers" and content firewalls.
jev is insane 🫣
it makes realtime virtual try-on hauls possible.
built this experiment for Drape with @typesafeai
> i talk
> jev reads transcript + what i'm wearing
> picks from my closet
> changes my outfit in realtime
cost: $0.0011 per decision
time: ~620ms per decision
imagine getting ready like this:
Jev + Astra beats the Ender Dragon in Minecraft in 8 minutes 43 seconds! ⏱️
Cost less than $1 ($0.01 Jev, $0.96 Astra)
I open sourced the code and explain the harness setup below. This type of movement is only possible with Jev's near instant decisionmaking, and some continually learning skills from Astra.
Every guide on this site in one page, grouped by the question it answers: what Jev is, what a decision costs, how to put it inside an agent, and what it is already being used for across the 822 builds catalogued here.
Jerry Liu
@jerryjliu0
DocJev is the fastest way to classify and split complex document packets ⚡️. (and the default is fully free and OSS!)
I made a sick teaser video below. TY Opus 5.5 🙏
check it out: github.com/jerryjliu/docj…
I built a free internal linking tool using @typesafeai Jev for classifying and selecting the links.
BYOK or pay $1 to use mine. It works for up to 500 pages and gives you a CSV or JSON to pass to an LLM to implement.
ian.is/tools/internal…
Jev + on-device models = results in seconds with no LLM in the loop.
Quick demo app to show the possibilities. Drop in an audio file: Ear detects the language, Voz transcribes it and Redact removes PII.
Then @typesafeai's Jev makes about 20 decisions in one call in milliseconds, and picks which of our on-device models to run. Voice memo to to-do list. Meeting to redacted transcript. Podcast to clips.
Our guide to the term: split an agent into an LLM that writes, Jev that decides and code that acts, with the rules the builds on this site have in common.
Meet Shukla
@meetshukla_
i’m probably going to regret this.
10,000+ videos were imported by our users into Ghostfeed in last 6 months.
this weekend, we picked 1,066 reaction videos and analysed all of them with JEV + GEMINI.
now you can search by structure, reaction, and who’s on camera.
opening the library today which has been our months of data gathering, clone all videos to mass publish them on instagram, tiktok and youtube.
comment "reactions" if you want the access to the library.
I built a Sales Copilot using Jev
→ Listens to sales call live
→ Tells you what to say next
→ Helps you follow the script and handle objections
→ Shows you what stage of the call you're in
→ Gives you live signals and probability of closing
Demo below on a recorded sales call:
What people actually use Jev for, from 822 catalogued builds: 100,000 posts scored in 20.4 seconds, 500 emails triaged for 3.5 cents, a flight search in about 7 seconds.
Justin Schroeder
@jpschroeder
I rebuilt Tesla Full Self Driving with Jev in less than an hour.
This model is a total unlock.
jev is INSANE.
in 40 seconds it broke down 724 live ads from 37 brands.
every hook. every format. offer. cta. awareness stage. landing page mismatch. used 9 cents of tokens.
(will be avail in @stealads + mcp)
Our own: a Mac app that sorts, labels and marks your Gmail with a System One model running on your machine, so nothing is uploaded and nothing is installed in your browser. In build now, and the first 50 on the list pay $5.
Faadil Shaik
@faadilhshaik
got @typesafeai’s new model Jev to play Super Mario Bros.
fast inference + structured outputs makes it surprisingly good for real time use cases.
I'm excited to see what can be done with these new models!
Jev + SuperX = virality solved ✅
Every post gets 61 questions in ~1s for $0.0004 🤯
> fitted on 9,481 real posts from 207 creators
> picks the viral post 2 in 3 times
> never rewards reply bait
So: write, score, rewrite, stop when it peaks.
Free, no signup. try it below ↓
No: TypeSafe serves Jev from its API and has not published the weights. These are the open models that answer typed questions locally — Julia 1 at 144.3M, Laya at 421M, von under 15 ms.
OpenRouter
@OpenRouter
1/ Jev, a decision model by @typesafeai, sparked a burst of projects and discussion. We tested it using Ori Eval against popular LLMs on OpenRouter at judging.
Jev was >5x faster than the next fastest model, and even its slowest requests beat every other model's median.
Jev + LinkedIn bookmarks = your saved posts are finally searchable ✅
479 posts classified in 225 seconds for $0.0195 🤯
LinkedIn has no native way to search what you saved Jev reads every post and tags the topic, hook, and format you can finally find that post you saved 6 months ago
So: save, classify, search. Never lose a good post again.
Free and open source. try it below ↓
We built a plugin that gives Jev a browser in Cline, and have been blown away by the results.
1. Install it in our new desktop app: Customize > Marketplace > Plugins > search 'jev-browser'
2. Create a Vercel AI Gateway API key, then save it to ~/.cline/plugins/cline-jev-browser.config.json as {"gateway": {"apiKey": "..."}} and restart Cline.
3. Ask any browser task and it will launch Chrome in the background to complete it.
Our own count: every public Jev build in week one, with the median published cost per decision, the median decision time, and the stars and languages of every repository created since launch. Free to cite, with the rows as JSON.
Cua
@trycua
1/ Introducing CUA-S1: a family of System One Models, small, specialized, and built for computer use.
Today we're open-sourcing CUA-S1-FORMS, the first in the family: github.com/trycua/cua
🎇 I made a small Chrome extension: a side panel that drives any site's WebMCP tools with Jev!
When you type, on every keystroke it picks the relevant page's tool, fills in the arguments, and tells you how sure it is.
Here it is grocery shopping:
jev is INSANE.
in 243 ms it checked a website for 35 tells of ai slop.
purple gradients. emoji headers. "seamlessly". fake testimonials. bento grids. the works. used $0.00015 of tokens.
paste any url, get a slop score. free:
madewithjev.com/free-tools/ai-…
Your first Jev call, line by line: the state, the questions, the typed answer and what to do with the confidence score. Then the SDKs, the gateways and 58 video walkthroughs.
Romàn
@romanbuildsaas
JEV is INSANE.
We gave it 700 high-intent leads and personalised outreach messages.
In 40 seconds, it predicted how each message would perform, assigned a confidence score and detected lead-message mismatches.
All for just $0.09.
JEV can also score leads, analyse buying signals, match each prospect with the best message and identify the campaigns most likely to perform based on data.
Coming soon to @GojiberryAI+ MCP.
Comment “JEV” for early access.
I gave Jev 3,282 of my X posts across 100M views and asked it to find what actually works for growth.
4,252,330 tokens $0.1282 for the full 8m 34s run!
Each post got 8 questions about the topic, hook, tone, whether it teaches something, etc.
How-to posts got 150 median likes vs the average median of 44.
AI and coding was a 1.9x multiplier topic compared and SEO, despite recent posts, was right at base median 1.0x - surprisingly.
The recommended topic + angle + voice formula was:
AI coding + teach something + provocative
We just ran Jev on our WebMCP benchmark.
The result: basically broke the benchmark.
Jev + Mercury 2.5 (a fast, low-cost LLM) using WebMCP solved 100% of the tasks at roughly 112× lower model cost than GPT-6 Astra using computer use with code execution. Compared to Astra using screenshot-based computer use, the model cost was 245× lower (!).
We also compared Jev operating the browser with and without WebMCP.
We used Browser Use’s open-source Ultrafast, with some improvements to the harness to make it more reliable across the benchmark.
Jev’s browser-control accuracy on its own was not amazing - adding WebMCP nearly doubled the number of solved tasks, from 25/49 to 49/49, while reducing model cost by 18% (more on why below).
The benchmark and methodology are fully open and reproducible.
Full results: https://webmcp.com/benchmark
A few words on how the Jev + WebMCP harness works and why this is exciting:
Jev receives text as input and a set of discrete options it can choose from. With WebMCP, those options are the tools exposed by the website. At each step, Jev sees the task, the available tools and previous results, then picks what to do next.
The limitation is that Jev can’t generate arbitrary text, which you need for tool arguments. For example, it can choose the search_products tool, but it can’t generate the search query itself.
So we split the work: Jev picks the tool and Mercury 2.5 generates the arguments if needed.
This works well because turns out most of the cognitive load in these tasks is around choosing the right action. The argument generation itself is relatively simple, so we can delegate to a small and very fast model. We used Mercury, which outputs 1,000+ tokens/sec and is very cheap.
The result is a pretty simple combination: Jev for tool selection + Mercury for arguments + WebMCP for the interface. It ends up being very reliable, very fast, and very cheap.
A few words about Ultrafast and why do we think it underperforms:
Without WebMCP, Jev chooses from the page’s controls: which button to click, which field to fill, or which option to select.
But choosing a valid button is different from choosing the right next step. The agent still has to navigate menus, understand forms, recover from errors and recognize when the task is actually complete.
Our hypothesis is that WebMCP makes the decision space much simpler. Instead of figuring out a sequence of clicks through a website, Jev chooses explicit actions that directly advance the task.
@typesafeai itself documents weaker accuracy on questions requiring multiple reasoning steps. WebMCP moves much of that complexity into the website’s tools, leaving Jev with clearer decisions and fewer opportunities to go wrong (in a sense WebMCP "compresses" a sequence of clicks into one tool call).
Our modified Ultrafast setup solved 25/49 tasks - that is a result for our particular implementation and benchmark, not a universal limit on Jev or Browser Use. We are open to more harness optimization to get this result to perform better, feel free to directly contribute to the benchmark here: https://github.com/nekuda-ai/WindTunnel
Browser-use ultrafast: https://github.com/browser-use/jev-ultrafast
I used Jev to classify 1,018 AI research papers.
The result: $0.08 total cost and 256ms median end-to-end latency per paper.
The pipeline was:
1. Summarize each paper with DeepSeek V4 Flash
2. Send the title + summary + 24 possible topics to Jev
3. Use Jev to classify each paper
4. Visualize everything on http://1kpapers.com
The summaries cost $3.99 on @togethercompute. The classifications cost $0.08 on @typesafeai.
So for just over $4 of inference, I ended up with a pretty useful way to explore the top AI research papers from the past year.
I think this is where things are heading: different models for different parts of the workflow, instead of using one model for everything.
I’m running evals on the Jev classifications before replacing the current ones, but the site is already live: http://1kpapers.com
Choice picks one of up to 255 options, Score places text on 2 to 10 levels you describe, and Noul returns the probability of yes. The request and answer for each, how to write the question, and the mistakes TypeSafe documents.
leo
@leojrr
rebuilt the X algorithm with Jev
- uses real weights
- simulates virality of your post
- has a global feed (you see everyone)
it's insanely accurate
Jev (@typesafeai) is so insane & cheap for search!!
> 6000+ @ycombinator Startups indexed.
> Sub 1 second search results.
> 90M tokens & $2.7 in total testing costs.
Search any startup in a second, in any way!
- Color - Niche - Your Competitor - Age - Image - etc...
> watch the entire video, it's so freaking cool omg!
> this is the coolest thing i have ever built for fun! (worked on it for 2 days straight!)
Just trying out Jev, I made a Chrome extension that:
- Listens to your YouTube audio (optional)
- Detects if it gets to a sponsor segment
- Skips it ➡️➡️➡️
- All in real-time while costing ~$0.005 per video
Prototype project, BYOK, open-source:
github.com/trungdq88/yout…
822 Jev projects, with the figures their authors published
Made with Jev is a directory of what people have built with Jev, the System One model from TypeSafe AI: 822 projects in 21 use cases, 343 of them open-source repositories. Every entry links to its source. New to the model? Read what Jev is, then what people use Jev for. The counts behind this page are in the Jev statistics.